Home Blog Page 11

The Power to Work Towards Social Change: Interview with Real Life Hero Manisha

One of our diverse SOGIESC #RealLifeHeroes is Manisha from Blue Diamond Society in Nepal. Manisha uses she / her pronouns and is the current Executive Director of Blue Diamond Society. Established in 2001, Blue Diamond Society is an LGBT+ advocacy organisation in Nepal. Blue Diamond Society has played a central role in the advancement of LGBT+ rights in Nepal.

Tell us a little bit about yourself

As a transgender women, I have and continue to face discrimination and stigma. This has been happening since childhood from family, school, in public places, from service providers and from the state. These challenges give me the power to work towards social change for the sexual and gender minority communities.  I try to change the mindset of the people at various levels of society including policy makers.

Tell us about your humanitarian experience

Nepal faced the devastating Gorkha earthquake in 2015 where more than 10,000 people died, and many more become homeless. Blue Diamond Society did not have the capacity to deal with such a humanitarian disaster. Before the earthquake, Blue Diamond Society had a HIV prevention program and human rights program. We really didn’t know what to do. We circulated appeal for support and was able to generate funds to help us in our recovery efforts. We supported our LGBTIQ+ community and their families and fixed our office. We organised 15 campsites in Kathmandu and organised a kitchen in our care support centre for our community. We mobilised our community to search for missing friends, organise funerals for our LGBTIQ+ community members,   and we were also volunteered in the hospital.

We have been involved in humanitarian work during the earthquake and in the COVID-19 pandemic,  but since its establishment, Blue Diamond has been supporting LGBTIQ+ people against police harassment, any legal cases from family, workplace, any need of medical and surgical case where community members need support. We think these are also emergencies situation for us.

In this time of Covid-19 pandemic, many LGBTIQ+ people have been facing challenges to survive, with issues connected to their livelihoods, and discrimination in relief distribution. In both humanitarian situations, LGBTIQ+ people in Nepal have experienced discrimination during emergency relief distribution from the state, signalling a lack of recognition at policy level of the LGBTIQ community.

Working with the grassroots community, people really want Blue Diamond Society to support them as for many LGBTIQ+ people, we are one of the frontline pioneer organisations that stands up to help. Blue Diamond Society calls for action from humanitarian agencies by providing emergency relief in the form of food, other necessary non-food items, inclusive dignity kits for our LGBTIQ+ community during the Covid-19 pandemic. Blue Diamond Society has also organized counselling for mental health issues through webinar with support from mental health experts. Blue Diamond Society is raising the voices of community to end inequalities during the pandemic situation.

How are you connected to Edge Effect?

I am currently on a regional advisory board for Edge Effect that is undertaking research in Bangladesh, Philippines and Vanuatu on how inclusive the humanitarian system is for LGBTIQ+ people.  In the other hand, we have been coordinating with Edge Effect during the current COVID-19 humanitarian crisis situation. Blue Diamond Society also has a relationship with Edge Effect looking for future project opportunities.

What are some of the challenges you face in advocating for more inclusion in the humanitarian system?

Government do not have any inclusive policies for LGBTIQ people. These are main challenges for LGBTIQ+ people, that and the mindset is still gender binary.

If there was one change that you would like to see for LGBTIQ+ people, what would that change be?

End inequalities through inclusive policy

What are ways can humanitarian and development organisations support LGBTIQ+ inclusion?

They should include LGBTIQ+ people in their policies, funding opportunities, and they should proactively approach us during these kind of humanitarian situation. Humanitarian agencies should also welcome LGBTIQ + people for jobs, consultancy and funding for LGBTIQ+ organizations.

Sharing Stories of Resilience and Strength: Interview with Real Life Hero Lavetanalagi Seru

One of our diverse SOGIESC #RealLifeHeroes is Lavetanalagi Seru, a member of Rainbow Pride Foundation’s Secretariat. Lavetanalagi Seru (he/him) currently manages the SOGIESC inclusion in DRR and humanitarian action, and is based in Suva, Fiji. Rainbow Pride Foundation advocates for the rights of LGBTIQ+ people in Fiji in multiple ways, including empowering the LGBTIQ+ community to engage in democratic processes.

What inspires you to advocate for social change?

I guess being a part of the LGBTQI community myself I have come to understand and see firsthand, the multiple forms of inequalities that LGBTQI community members face on a daily basis within their homes, schools, communities and in public spaces [both online and offline] had driven me into this work, especially the multiple forms of stigma and discrimination that takes place on a daily basis.  

I have also seen the many opportunities and the strengths that the LGBTQI community members have had to offer and contribute to within the many different spaces and communities that they work in and that also sort of drive me to do the work that I do.

I like to share our stories and of how we [LGBTQI] contribute to society in many meaningful ways, stories of resilience and strength. These stories are hardly shared, and as I continue to advocate for social change and SOGIESC inclusion in the various policy and decision making spaces – there is slowly recognition of what it means, that there is “strength in diversity” – especially as we continue to work to build a much safer and inclusive Fijian society.

What is your experience with humanitarian disasters?

I have been engaged in the disaster preparedness work at sub national and national levels, and also in disaster response and recovery. For instance, I am currently engaged in the TC Harold and COVID-19 response work, where our organizational is working with key partners to ensure that in their respective response activities and programmes are inclusive of LGBTQI people.

Before these disasters took place, I have been engaged in facilitating trainings with other organizations to ensure gender and social inclusion within emergency operation centres. This is at sub national level [district and divisional level] where I facilitate the SOGIESC inclusion in DRR training for civil servants from various Government Ministries and agencies – who are called to be part of Emergency Operation Centres, which are usually activated during times of disasters. These trainings offers an opportunity for participants to understand more about the differential needs, vulnerabilities, risks and challenges that LGBTQI people in peaces times and that is further exacerbated during times of disasters.

I have also facilitated trainings for different partner organisations that work in the DRR & humanitarian sector, where we push for these organisations to adopt SOGIESC transformative work approaches, inclusive programmes – identifying the gaps within policies and practice [that would have limited engagement and/or discriminated against LGBTQI people] and also gaps within data collection tools used by these organisations and its staff. It offers an opportunity for staff to be considerate of context appropriate approaches that uphold the principle of “Do No Harm” as they work with LGBTQI community members and to design and implement interventions that integrates and embeds strong SOGIESC inclusion lens.

At the national level, I have been engaged in the review of national policies and legislations on Disaster Risk Reduction – where as an organization we have been pushing for SOGIESC inclusion to be integrated, where LGBTQI issues are addressed, because over the years – we have a lack of coherence between our national laws and policies when it comes to human rights.

How did you become involved in supporting LGBTIQ+ people in humanitarian contexts?

I guess, I have had to learn on the job, but have been exceptionally blessed to have a great team at the office who support the work I do. Understanding the social and cultural context and talking directly with LGBTQI community members are critical and has been something I have slowly built upon. I have sometimes had to be in a room and be the lone voice for the LGBTQI community – where as much as fear sometimes overwhelms me – I have to remind myself of the many LGBTQI people whose lives depends on what I say or choose not to say [if I decide to remain silent] in these spaces, and over the years – I have slowly grown out of the introvert that I am, especially when talking about LGBTQI rights and equality in these difficult spaces.

How long have you been involved in this work?

I have been involved in this work with RPF when I joined in March 2018. During my initial few months when I joined RPF, I worked briefly on an activity that stemmed from the Down by the River Research – which was the initial stages of identifying how to work with Faith Based Organizations, but have been part of the human rights advocacy work going back to 2014 – when I was still a University student.

What are some of the challenges you face in advocating for more inclusion in the humanitarian system?

Some of the challenges have been around the pushback on LGBTQI rights and equality work – and this I guess, stems from the fear and also the lack of knowledge about LGBTQI people. This is not something that has been experienced with individuals alone but also some organizations – which have for years worked in communities and has had a certain modus operandi – and to bring in these “uncomfortable” conversations – there is a perception or assumption that it will affect how they continue to work within these communities.

If there was one change that you would like to see for LGBTIQ+ people, what would that change be?

The change I’d like to see is more LGBTQI community members actively and meaningfully engaged in all the phases of disaster risk management – in initial disaster preparedness, response and recovery – where they are able to inform the interventions that considers their needs and challenges, and where together we build a more safer and inclusive Fijian society.

What are ways can humanitarian and development organisations support LGBTIQ+ inclusion?

Some of the ways that humanitarian and development organizations can support SOGIESC inclusion is by consulting and working closely with organizations such as RPF and other LGBTQI organizations who have had years of experience working with communities on the ground.

They can also begin to incorporate SOGIESC inclusive practices and policies and work towards ensuring that their programmes and activities become SOGIESC transformative in the sense that its programmes, practices, policies and interventions addresses the root causes of inequalities, transforming harmful societal, heteronormative and cultural norms, relations and roles.

How COVID-19 responses are endangering trans people in Latin America

This news article looks at the specific challenges government response to COVID-19 faced by the trans community in Latin America. The article first looks at the impact of “pico y género” (‘peak and gender,’ which meant different shopping days for women and men) in Panama and Colombia on the trans community, citing the discrimination of security guards and police as specific problems. The article considers how this policy has played out in different countries, and the extent to which different governments have acknowledged the ways the policy has worsened pre-existing discrimination.

The article then considers the impacts of these policies on trans asylum seekers–people who have left their countries as a result of SOGIE-based discrimination and violence. The article provides some background on the trans and non-binary community in Panama, where citizens cannot legally change their gender. The article finishes by considering the severe mental health consequences of this policy in a time of COVID-19.

US asylum shutdown leaves LGBTQ+ people stranded and in danger in Mexico

This news article demonstrates the negative and life-threatening impact of the Trump administration’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy on trans asylum seekers. The article provides a brief summary of the ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy: the policy has been in place since early 2019 as part of the Trump administration’s effort to deter migrants from seeking asylum in the United States. Under this policy, asylum seekers who attempt to enter the United States through the border with Mexico are forced to wait in Mexico’s border towns while their asylum hearing date.

The article then discusses the impact of waiting for asylum hearings on trans asylum seekers, especially considering the lawlessness and presence of drug cartels in these towns. The article then discusses the particular challenges faced by trans and queer asylum seekers stuck in Mexico.

Trans and queer asylum seekers stuck in Mexico face extreme violence and discrimination, and are unable to find employment, access shelter, food or health care because of discrimination based on their multiple identities (foreign, trans or queer, asylum seeker). Overall flows of asylum seekers from Central America have slowed, but there has been an increase in trans and queer asylum seekers.

The article then considers the implications of violence against LGBTIQ+ asylum seekers, as well as the challenge of obtaining asylum in the United States based on sexual orientation and gender identity. The article then discusses the additional burden of COVID-19, and the way it is being politicised to prevent asylum seekers from entering the United States.

Organising in the Face of Adversity: Interview with Real Life Hero Ajeng

One of our diverse SOGIESC #RealLifeHeroes is Ajeng Kartika, one of the founders of Esbisquet. Esbisquet, a collective of LBQ & Trans community at Palangkaraya (Central Borneo, Indonesia), was established in respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. Esbisquet envisions that their basic needs (food, shelter, WASH and livelihood) will be fulfilled and they will be able to adapt and bounce back from the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. At present, apart from COVID-19 response, Esbisquet is active in advocacy, networking and community empowerment.

What name would you like us to use for you? Ajeng Kartika

What pronoun do we use for you? She/ Ms

Where are you based? Palangkaraya, Kalimantan Tengah (Central Borneo), Indonesia

What is the name of the organisation you work with?

I am active at Esbisquet. As a community focal point, I encourage the LBQ & Trans community to learn the importance of being together and being organized and I encourage everyone to learn about their human rights.

What is your connection to Edge Effect? (what project / how are you involved?)

I was involved with Edge Effect in a WASH project at eastern Indonesia since 2018. The project aims to assure that the public WASH facilities are safe, accessible and inclusive for everyone, including LGBTIQ+ community. At that time, I was a staff at Arus Pelangi and I helped the project as a community organizer. Last year I left Arus Pelangi and I moved to Central Kalimantan. I continue to be part of the community organizer team for the project until now.

Is there a particular area that you work in? (e.g. HIV/ Human Rights, WASH)

I started as an HIV & AIDS field officer at Bogor (West Java), so I basically have a good understanding and experience of the HIV & AIDS issue. The community here (at Central Kalimantan), especially Transpuan*, do not have much information on HIV & AIDS so this is something that they need. Friends at Esbisquet on the other hand are learning about human rights. Due to the pandemic, I also shared about learnings from my experience in our project in eastern Indonesia on water, sanitation, and hygiene. There is not much differences between my experience with the community here and the knowledge I learned from our project with Edge Effect had much advantages for me, as it goes beyond human rights.

How did you become involved in LGBTIQ+ activism?

Back in the days when I was active as a sex worker, I experienced so much violence. It was also difficult for me to access public services such as making a government ID or getting any government support at all because of my identity as a Transpuan. I did not know whom to go to for help. Back then I realized, how can they (other people) be like that while I could not?

I ‘felt’ into activism after I attended Transchool in 2014. Transchool is an alternative school for young Transpuan living at Jakarta and its surrounding cities. Before that I was not aware on the existence of any LGBTIQ+ rights organizations. I learned and I understood more through Transchool and I became more passionate.

I also realized that there were not many people who can help our friends, not many that really focused to fight for our rights, so no matter how battered I was, I just kept on going, my friends kept me going. Then I joined Arus Pelangi and a few other organizations. I understood even more.

What inspired you to continue working for social change?

The water here stinks, there are many open-drainages and the rubbish are everywhere. When I personally talk about inspiration and social transformation, I start from the smallest things. For example, my neighbour has so many cats, so the cats’ litter is our topic of conversation. Our experience at eastern Indonesia taught us to start from our smallest circles. For example, there are rubbish piles in front of our house, then we encourage our neighbourhood to dump the rubbish to the landfill, or we burn it together (that’s the practice here).

I also see many friends, including myself, who have very minimum knowledge and education.  So, I also think that it’s important for all of us to smash those who think they are so good. I also realized and I still do until this very second, that there are not many opportunities for us because of our minimum knowledge and education, so let’s reclaim those spaces. Those who inspire are those of us who are weak, those of us who are considered uneducated, those of us who are not given spaces, those of us who are equally willing to learn. So, let’s reclaim those power-spaces.

How long have you been involved in this work?

In 2014 I started to understand because I attended Transchool. Prior to that in 2010, I met with Kampung Belajar, an HIV & AIDS group in Bogor. I had the passion, but I did not know the how. I felt it was unfair when I had to give my money to the street thugs or when I was arrested by the Satpol PP (public decency police). I fought then, but without any strategy, just passion. After 2014, I got a lot of trainings and information, I understood better about strategies, steps, processes, etc.

What are some of the approaches and methods you use in your LGBTIQ+ activism?

Our friends often see us as the “angel of salvation”, especially those who had very minimum information. We often forget that we are just like them. My approach is becoming them, empathy, we are the same.

Then we became friends because we had the same fate, without bringing any of my background in Transchool or other trainings. So, the approach starts by having the same fate. For example, when I had no connection in one area (ie. eastern Indonesia), I looked for the community focal points, I actively connected with them through social media, we became offline friends and we learned that we are the same.

Apart from sharing common fate, we often have limited or no gathering spaces at all. So, the other approach is to create safe spaces to gather and to share information. We had BBQ as we shared with each other. Back then we could get together wherever we want without fear, but now those spaces are very limited. We miss our gathering spaces and I created those gathering and safe spaces as an approach.

What are some of the challenges you face in your LGBTIQ+ activism?

The challenges are not just from the outside (external). I know when we talk about changes, we can’t do it alone. We need our friends and networks. Yet one of the biggest challenges until this very second is that our friends in some areas have very limited understanding. When we talk about human rights, for example harassment, many do not understand what that is. We saw a friend at eastern Indonesia who was harassed in front of a supermarket by her uncle. He was teasing her and was asking her for sex, she declined yet she was permissive. She was not annoyed. She took that situation for granted. I wouldn’t know what would happen if I was not there. This is a common situation across the communities. Many even blame themselves. So, our biggest homework is not just external but our internal community and the lack of equal access to information and education for them to accept themselves. How can we step up and encourage changes at public spaces (externally) when we are not strong enough? Many cases happen to our friends because of their lack of education and information.

What do you like best about being an activist?

I am happy because I now have a lot of friends and families. I used to be a homey girl who was afraid that I would not be able to eat if I leave the house. Now, I have so many friends and families. I am no longer afraid. I also have much understanding and I know better on how I would walk my life to fight for my rights, to share with the others. That’s my spirit.

If there was one change that you would like to see for LGBTIQ+ people, what would that change be?

Everyone has equal opportunities. On everything, because, so far, based on my experience in the community, when we talk about equal opportunities, a lot of friends do not get the opportunity to access information. There is no equal opportunity to develop as there are connections and privileges at play. We talk about equality and inclusion externally, often without realizing that our very own selves have not been upholding it. We often want to be prioritized and we feel that we are very special, and often when we voice-out and we get the spaces, we forget to share it with the others. I also feel that the past few years we surrendered. We are waiting for spaces to be given to us. So, when we talk about equality, we just get the leftovers.

I dream that more friends will be active, we voice ourselves to claim spaces without putting ourselves into boxes. We face the future as we are all human. We move together based on our humanity.

What are ways can humanitarian and development organisations support LGBTIQ+ inclusion?

Actually, friends at those organizations are very similar to the society at large. They are not radical. They are aware of our rights, but they just don’t care. Our friends (LGBTIQ+ community) are often use as objects/ beneficiaries, not as a team who are learning together. So, when there is an inclusion project, they gave us our portion then they walked away as if they had done good. So, this is not about organization, this is about people’s values. There are people who join organizations because of humanity, their values stay wherever they are. But there are also people who work without internalizing the values. There are many people like that, and they often confuse me. “Do you speak on behalf of yourselves or your organizations?” Maybe their organizations have values, but the people inside focus on working, according to their mandate, SOPs, without any values at tall. So, in the end, the community just became objects, as beneficiaries.

My point is, it’s really important for us to collaborate equally and learn together as a team.


* Transpuan is collective identity that has gained popularity over recent years. Transpuan community used this identity to free themselves from degrading identities that were assigned by people outside the community, including Banci, Bencong, Wadam (Wanita-Adam), Waria (Wanita-Pria); to free themselves from man-related terms such as Pria and Adam, and to free themselves from the degrading definition of the woman-identity “Wanita” (wani-toto; which translates to “can be arranged”) and use “Perempuan” as a woman-identity alongside the feminist movement (Arus Pelangi 2019, Modul Pendidikan Dasar SOGIESC/ SOGIESC basic training module).

‘States must include LGBT community in COVID-19 response’: The how and why from a UN expert

This brief statement by the human rights experts including the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR), UN Committee on the Rights of Child, IE Victor Madrigal Borloz and others, on IDAHOBIT 2020 identifies the key human rights concerns for people with LGBT during the COVID-19 pandemic, and identifies state obligations to protect the rights of LGBT people.

The statement notes that COVID-19 itself and response measures exacerbate existing inequalities and discrimination, and make LGBT people more vulnerable not only to contracting COVID-19, but also to police abuse, arbitrary arrest, ill-health as a result of closures of other health services and other rights abuses. The increased persecution that the pandemic has brought means some states have taken the opportunity to pass discriminatory legislation as well as widespread digital surveillance, all of which may have significant negative impacts on the rights of LGBT people and communities.

The statement closes by urging states and non-state actors to give visibility to and protect LGBT persons within the context of the pandemic.

Vulnerability Amplified: The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on LGBTIQ People

This report presents the findings of a month long research project by OutRight International. The project included a review of literature and in-depth interviews with 59 LGBTIQ people from 38 countries on their experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic and experiences with State responses and restrictions. The report opens with an executive summary, made up of an overview of the key themes and a summary of the conclusions and recommendations.

The report then moves into an introduction, providing a snapshot of the global context and pandemic. timeline. A discussion on methodology follows, highlighting the limitations of the rapid assessment used during the four-week research process. A background on the differential risks facing LGBTIQ people during times of crisis–such as during various natural disasters and previous pandemics–is provided. The findings of OutRight’s research is then presented.

The seven themes of the findings are: devastation of livelihoods and associated rise in food insecurity; disruptions in health care access; elevated risk of family or domestic violence; increased isolation and anxiety; concerns about elevated societal stigma including violence, discrimination and scapegoating; instances of abuse of state power; and anxiety about organisational survival and need for community support and unity. Each of these themes is explored in detail.

The hardships of the global pandemic are compounded by national circumstance, as is evidenced by respondents from Venezuela, which recently experienced near total economic collapse, for Syrian refugees living in Lebanon, and for Ugandan respondents, who cannot get tested due in part to lack of tests, but also as a result of deeply embedded stigma in the health care system. These are just some of the specific challenges discussed in the findings section.

Overall, the report found that the unprecedented challenge of COVID-19 is exacerbating the profound inequities experienced by LGBTIQ people. The report concludes with recommendations for governments at all levels; for all donors; for UN agencies and for humanitarian and other relief responders.

Out in the open – Education sector responses to violence based on sexual orientation and gender identity/expression

This detailed 142-page report presents the findings from a review of the latest research on violence based on sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression in educational settings. The results are based on a global literature review of over 500 resources, three regional consultation initiatives, data collection by 20 key-informants on the national education sectors policies on violence against students of diverse SOGIE and 53 key-informant interviews.

The report comprises four sections. Section one provides context to the nature of violence based on sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression in educational settings. It demonstrates the extent of the problem across the globe and outlines the impact of such violence on students, such as poor educational, employment and health outcomes. Section two presents the data from the six different regions of the world: Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean, North America and The Pacific.

Key findings from countries within each region are highlighted. Section three then demonstrates the critical role of the education sector in addressing such violence and outlines how the sector is currently responding to homophobic and transphobic violence. Section three also lists seven key principles for the education sector to follow when responding to homophobic and transphobic violence and details the components of a comprehensive education sector response. The report concludes with section four offering seven recommendations to the education sector to improve their policies on homophobic and transphobic violence in educational settings.

LGBTIQ+ COMMUNITIES AND COVID-19: A report on the impacts of COVID-19 on Australian LGBTIQ+ communities and building a strong response

This report is on the experiences, concerns and needs of LGBTIQ+ people during the initial phases of the COVID-19 pandemic and response in Australia. This report draws together the findings from a 26 March 2020 workshop with 42 LGBTIQ+ and allied organisations as well as subsequent input. The report notes that LGBTIQ+ people, communities and organisations are resilient, resourceful and creative, but that there is an urgent need for the government and service providers to act in solidarity with the LGBTIQ+ community.

The report opens with a brief overview of the consultation before delving into fundamental principles for an inclusive COVID-19 response and recovery plan. There are a total of four principles that touch on economic stimulus and general government response. The report then goes into greater depth on the immediate issues faced by the LGBTIQ+ community. These issues include mental health concerns, discrimination in medical settings, access to information, social isolation and dislocation, family violence against LGBTIQ+ people, and considering the intersectional needs of LGBTIQ+ people who are also disabled and elderly. An important note around the need to continue to develop and pass progressive legislation, as well as critically consider the increasing role of law enforcement in the lives of Australians, is also included.

A section on medium and long-term issues follows. This focuses on the predicted financial disadvantage for the LGBTIQ+ community–especially for those in the arts, tourism, retail and hospitality–the absence of reliable data, and the viability of LGBTIQ+ organisations in the absence of events.

ASPIRE Guidelines on COVID-19 response and recovery free from violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity

The ASPIRE Guidelines were developed through consultation with global diverse SOGI activists and advocates. Published through the office of the Independent Expert on protection against violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, Victor Madrigal-Borloz, the ASPIRE Guidelines offer high-level advice for policy makers on inclusive COVID-19 response.

ASPIRE stands for: Acknowledge that LGBT persons are everywhere (and that they are hard-hit by the pandemic); Support the work of LGBT civil society and human rights defenders (and learn from their significant achievements); Protect LGBT persons from violence and discrimination in the pandemic context (and prosecute perpetrators); Indirect discrimination is a real and significant risk (and exacerbates stigmatisation against LGBT persons); Representation of LGBT persons in the process of design, implementation and evaluation of COVID-19 specific measures is key (and reflect their voices); and Evidence concerning the impact of COVID-19 on LGBT persons must be gathered (and States must follow good practice).

The ASPIRE Guidelines open with an overview of the consultation sessions and the current global crisis. Each section of the guidelines, headed by one of the above mandates, identifies specific instances of discrimination and cases where specific protection and purposeful inclusion is necessary. The importance of State engagement with LGBT organisations and networks is emphasised throughout the guidelines.